Advertisement

Updated for:

Friday, September 10, 2010 5:49 AM

The Sentinel Newspapers

Helpful Tools

Subscribe to:

  • RSS

It's called Murder


Share This Article:

Published on: Monday, May 10, 2010

By Brian J. Karem

Two of the most disgusting crimes to affect the Montgomery County area in recent memory surfaced this week.

At first it's hard to muster anything more than a "Gee, really," when contemplating them.

Horrifying crimes seem as rampant these days as Tiger Woods stories.

Yet, upon further reflection, both crimes need to be examined for a variety of reasons.

In the case of the death of principal Brian Betts, it is the spectacle of his sexual orientation that seems to have driven the compassion from the hearts of some.

"You know I heard he was gay," someone said to be in the grocery story the other day.

"Well, that explains it," I said.

"You're rude," I was told.

I bit my tongue a bit, because those who know me are aware of the fact that filter between what I think and what I say is a very thin membrane which has a tendency to break under the slightest provocation.

I almost said, "And you're an idiot," but I refrained.

I merely nodded and left.

The facts are disturbing however when you consider them. Three local D.C. area teenagers arrested and charged with killing Betts - who may have solicited them on a sex chat line.

The preliminary evidence seems to indicate the three had contact with the dead man, but relatives claim the charges are fictitious.

Whatever the case here, Betts remains dead and some seem to want to dismiss the violence of the crime and his death - chalking it up to Betts being a gay man and soliciting young men on a chat line.

This excuses nothing. It matters little if he had been soliciting for goats that he wished to pursue romantically. He didn't deserve to die for it.

Which brings me to the next story on the menu; the death of a Virginia co-ed and the former Landon lacrosse player accused of killing her.

I've heard many who dismiss this crime with a shrug of the shoulders and the trite, "Well, it was probably an accident. He didn't mean to kill her."

In fact the young man apparently is going to try and use that as a defense, if published reports are accurate.

Good luck with that.

Maybe the young man didn't mean to kill her. Does that matter? Can we dismiss such violence so lightly?

The short answer is no.

Kicking a door in and beating someone to death isn't acceptable, nor is it excusable.

There is currently much rending of hair and gnashing of teeth going on in this young man's family - of that I have no doubt.

What mother wants her child to be behind bars for any extended length of time.

Both the victim and the accused were college seniors that were weeks away from graduation and the beginning of their life.

Now, both lives are effectively over.

Let's not, however, dismiss this as an accident. Let's forgive, yes, but let us not forget.

And let us strive to, once again, teach a little sanity that can be brought into everyone's life.

An accident? Does this comfort the family of the dead girl? Will this bring her back?

We all know the answer to that is a resounding no. And while I don't fathom throwing away this young man's life, the stakes can be no higher for him.

He faces losing everything he ever wanted and everything he ever dreamed because he is accused of taking those same things away from someone he apparently cared for very deeply - at least for a while.

This question, this issue is central to our core as human beings. How do we punish those who take away that which is most precious - our life?

How do we do it when it may have been an accident? Does it matter when violence is involved?

Whatever is decided in these two, very public cases, there are a few things that need to be remembered: a. Your sexual orientation doesn't excuse those who kill you. B. If you are accused of beating someone to death, it seems ludicrous to claim that the death was an accident.

But that's just me.

Reader Comments - 7 Total

captcha 63189ae7acad48f4a758248482f61215

Posted By: Quincy On: 5/12/2010

Title:

It's my understanding the accused in the Betts case solicited him under a false screenname as someone over 18 years old and had set up to meet with him for sex. This is perfectly legal, perhaps not moral behavior. When they showed up at his home, they overpowered him, killed him and robbed him. These guys could just as easily have done this to a woman on another hotline.
Based on the information publicly available, there is a possibility that this has happened before (assaults and robberies, not murder) and the victims have not come forward.
Nothing excuses murder in either of these cases. May the accused rot in jail.

Posted By: Roon On: 5/12/2010

Title: Why Plea Bargain

I am against any plea bargaining for any crime, so you can kill somone or a lot of people and get a plea bargain and not be exucuted, Wrong. I say if you are convicted of murder you get the ggod old death penalty Hanging, electrocution etc. That is what any other Country does in the world. But the good old USA shows pitty on the criminals.

Posted By: ks On: 5/12/2010

Title:

These so called "kids" are all 18. Well over the age of consent. While I don't condone cruising internet sites for sex, this is no excuse for killing a man, gay or straight. Lets not forget, those 3 young men were also cruising the same site. No doubt looking for someone to take advantage of. As for Huguely, I guess he didn't mean to kill her, only beat her up. Really? Is that a defense? Hope he gets the death penalty. Too bad DC doesn't have it.

Posted By: terri On: 5/11/2010

Title: you're preaching to the choir

There will always be idiots who somehow allude to the fact that the person "deserved it." Murder is murder, no matter how close the victim is to the criminal.

Posted By: Iamnotaverysympotheticperson On: 5/11/2010

Title: I agree

His sexual orientation is not a justification for his death. His stupidity is what caused his death. We live in violent times and he should have know better than to buy a pig in the poke. As for the lacross players, it would be interesting to know what medication he was subjected to in his formative years, Ritlin, Addarill, or what ever alphbet soup that was the soup djure employed with him. Please pardon my spelling, it is not one of my strong suites, UP WITH SPELL CHECK.

Posted By: Mont Co Resident since 1966 On: 5/11/2010

Title:

I do not care about sexual orientation between consenting adults. But if he was soliciting kids for sex (homosexual or heterosexual) my sympathy level for Mr. Betts goes way down, esp. considering his position as a principal. On the oher hand, if they attacked him just because of his sexual orientation and he was not soliciting them for sex, sympathy level remains at 100%. I think we need more information about the events that led to his murder before drawing any final conclusions.

Posted By: L. Jones On: 5/10/2010

Title:

Agreed!

Advertisement:

Today's Poll

Question: Another Governor's race check in: Who do you favor for Governor?
  • Bob Ehrlich
  • Martin O'Malley
  • someone else

Three Quarters UP

Three Quarters Up

Three Quarters UP
  • The controversial 70s: Sex, drugs, violence and a teenage boy named Jimmy.

    While the world revolves around issues like school integration, forced busing, the end of the Vietnam War and the post-Beatle break-up world of rock and roll, young Jimmy Kayrouz is trying to get over the ffith anniversary of his father's death.

    A high school football player with no sense of what's going on around him, he finds himself in the middle of a racial controversy when he begins dating a girl with a "Big Ole Smile". What happens next is the quintessential tale of growing up in the 70s.

2010 Highschool Football Guide

Current Issue

This Week's Issue

Thursday, September 02, 2010

Current Issue

This Week's Issue

Thursday, September 09, 2010

Classifieds

Advertisement:


Advertisement: